Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecution
Tax - The One Pager
April 15, 2025
Cum-cum-share deals: International investors in the focus of German criminal prosecutionTax - The One PagerApril 15, 2025 One of the most covered German tax scandals were the infamous cum-ex cases which resulted in numerous criminal convictions in recent years. Just recently public prosecutor’s offices across the nation shifted focus to cum-cum share deals and cum-cum/cum-ex variants involving primarily foreign investors. In March 2025, the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court allowed the public prosecution to bring charges against former managers of Deutsche Pfandbriefbank for tax evasion through cum-cum transactions. The tax loss in the case of cum-cum is considered times higher than cum-ex. Financial experts have estimated additional taxes of approx. 28.5 billion EUR. No wonder new investigation units and task forces at public prosecutor level are being established dedicated to holding investor and intermediates liable. StructureThere are many types of cum-cum structures ("dividend stripping"). In a nutshell, the idea is that foreign taxpayers avoid the full tax burden in Germany by transferring shares to domestic taxpayers shortly before the dividend record date. The domestic taxpayer is entitled to a capital gainer tax credit or refund, typically a local bank or other institution as domestic tax resident. Once the dividend has been paid out, it is transferred back to the foreign investor. Legal backgroundBy circular dated 9 July 2021 (BStBl 2021 I p. 995), the German tax authorities indicated to deem cum-cum-deals as abuse. A conviction for cum-cum by a criminal court has not yet taken place. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court has only ruled on the initiation of court proceedings. In light of the cum-ex convictions individuals face long prison sentences and financial institutions face high fines and the confiscation of any profits. Risks and opportunities for financial institutionsWe expect that financial institutions involved in cum-cum deals will be targeted by public prosecutors and tax authorities. Companies should therefore be prepared for investigations. On the one hand, this includes preparation of all employees for dawn raids. On the other hand, consideration should be given to clarifying the facts through internal investigations and examining whether a voluntary disclosure is necessary to minimise the risks. Key take-awaysFinancial institutions should therefore:
Latest Insights
Latest News
Latest Events
legal updates May 29, 2026 Consumer Lens - Session 1 | The Rise of European Class Actions podcasts and webcasts May 29, 2026 Tax NOLs in Cross-Border Structures Webinar legal updates May 28, 2026 EU Pay Transparency Directive legal updates May 28, 2026 Occupational pensions: What is the current status of the Social Partner Mod... client news June 02, 2026 Next stop, public ownership: Eversheds Sutherland advises DfT on GTR transi... firm news June 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens restructuring offering with senior partner... firm news June 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens Commercial Advisory practice with technolo... client news May 28, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Schroders Greencoat on acquisition of Dutch bi... virtual Spanish employment law training June 02, 2026 2pm - 5pm (BST) Virtual virtual UK employment law training June 09, 2026 1pm - 4pm (BST) Virtual virtual Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) employment law training June 16, 2026 12.45pm - 4pm (BST) Virtual virtual Introduction to Swiss employment law June 23, 2026 2pm - 5pm (GMT) Virtual |