Read our initial analysis of the DOL’s October 31 Fiduciary Rule proposal to again redefine ERISA fiduciary “investment advice” and to remake the complex of ERISA exemptions allowing conflicted advice. In our assessment, the proposal is not “more narrowly tailored” than the vacated 2016 rule.
As in the 2016 rule, the DOL would assume the role of universal “standard of conduct” regulator for the financial services industries and dictate practices for their relationships with retirement plans and IRAs.
As in the 2016 rule, any individualized investment interaction between a financial services professional and a “retirement investor” would in the main be treated as fiduciary advice.
As in the 2016 rule, an “investment advice” fiduciary would be permitted to give “conflicted advice” only under a narrowed set of exemptions that impose onerous conditions and threaten a private right of action for IRA owners.
If you have any questions about this Legal Alert, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work.
The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer.