Film Room: Massive penalties proposed for tampering violations

DI Cabinet endorses substantial penalties for tampering violations 

On February 27, the DI Cabinet announced that it had endorsed a proposal from the DI Football Bowl Subdivision Oversight Committee that would prescribe significant penalties for programs found to have tampered with student-athletes. The eye-opening proposed penalties include: 

• The head coach would be prohibited from all coaching, recruiting and administrative duties (team meetings) for six contests.
• The school would be fined 20% of its football budget.
• The school would be required to reduce the number of roster spots by five for the next season, regardless of the head coach’s employment status at the school.

These penalties substantially outpace the current penalty structure for tampering. Importantly, the DI Cabinet’s endorsement of stiffer penalties would apply to all sports, not just football. Men’s and women’s basketball programs, whose seasons are fast approaching their conclusion – which, for all but a few, will arrive well before the opening of the Transfer Portal window the day after the championship game – are well advised to pay particularly close attention to this rule. 

The timing is also of significant note. From the announcement: 

The cabinet also signaled that it would consider the proposed rule change’s effective date – if adopted – to be Feb. 25, 2026 [in other words, now!], which was the date the oversight committee formally introduced the proposal. Therefore, the penalties would apply to any sports program to which a student-athlete transfers without entering the portal and then participates in athletically related activities at the new school on and after that date.

What is prohibited tampering?

Given the substantial downside to a tampering violation, it is worth revisiting what activities are prohibited and expose a program to risk. Earlier in the week, Ross Dellenger of Yahoo! Sports reported on a communication from the NCAA to the membership that highlighted the prohibition on contact with student-athletes not in the Transfer Portal: 

Communications of any kind are not permitted with a student-athlete at another school – or any other representatives of their interests, including agents – before that student-athlete enters the NCAA Transfer Portal. If a coach is contacted by an agent of a student-athlete who is not in the Transfer Portal, any further continuation of that discussion is considered a rules violation. That includes a coach or a booster expressing interest in or suggesting the possibility of a roster spot opening for a student-athlete should the individual enter the Transfer Portal.

This recitation of the rule may surprise some coaches, many of whom can have a more narrow conception of prohibited activity. However, the above description does indeed accurately state the rule. NCAA Bylaw 13.1.1.4 provides: 

Four-Year College Prospective Student-Athletes. An athletics staff member or other representative of the institution’s athletics interests shall not communicate or make contact with the student-athlete of another NCAA Division I institution, or any individual associated with the student-athlete (e.g., family member, scholastic or nonscholastic coach, advisor), directly or indirectly, without first obtaining authorization through the notification of transfer process. (Emphasis added.)

The too common misunderstanding of the scope of the rule, along with the potential for substantial penalties – a violation could result in an eight-figure fine for many football schools – renders increased focus on this area imperative.

__________

If you have any questions about this Legal Briefing, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed or the Eversheds Sutherland attorney with whom you regularly work.