The breadth of our practice is notable for the types of services we provide our clients.
Consulting – we advise our clients on the tax consequences of their products, services, and transactions. Our advice has enabled them to determine the sales taxability of new offerings, the tax consequences of corporate reorganizations, and the identification of more efficient tax structures. Our work also includes advising our clients of the financial statement consequences of their tax positions.
Controversy – we represent our clients at every stage of tax disputes, from the receipt of audit letters, through trials, to appeals through state supreme courts. We approach controversies with the goal of identifying favorable resolutions. In those instances when matters cannot be resolved, we bring to bear extensive litigation and appellate experience. Our litigation has altered the SALT landscape and redefined how states and localities impose taxes.
Policy – many of our clients actively monitor state and local tax legislation and regulation. We provide monitoring services to our clients and alert them to proposals that may affect their businesses. We also provide our advice – including proposed legislative and regulatory language – to assist our clients to affect the adoption of particular provisions.
Our team is comprised of experienced SALT lawyers, several of whom have gained experience in Big 4 accounting firms and state tax organizations. We work collaboratively and bring the best team to each client challenge. Our SALT team is also known for its thought leadership. Our writing covers nearly every SALT development and is looked to by our clients and friends as a reliable source of SALT information and opinion.
Our lawyers are experienced in all aspects of SALT law. Our experience includes:
- representing a technology company before the California Court of Appeal in a matter related to the company’s characterization of its software sales for income tax purposes in California. The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision and upheld the company’s use of costs-of-performance sourcing
- representing one of the US’s largest wireless carriers in state sales tax matters, securing more than $40 million inrefunds for the client
- saving a Fortune 100 software and hardware company $70 million in potential tax liabilities stemming from a Washington State sales tax and Business& Occupation Tax dispute
- providing state tax advice and consulting to a leading online retailer on the taxability of their goods and services across the US
- serving as national state tax counsel to a Fortune 50 conglomerate and advises the company in every state in which it does business. We also provided state tax consulting and advice to the company and represent the company in its audits
"Eversheds Sutherland is a go-to firm for many legal issues, particularly state-level tax issues that require thoughtful analysis."
2024
Yhteyshenkilöt
Uusimmat Artikkelit
- legal updatesIllinois tax increases part two: Digital asset privilege tax, prediction markets, NOL carryover limitations, and more
- legal updatesIllinois tax increases part one: Digital services taxes
- podcasts and webcastsFederal preemption primer: The Supremacy Clause and state tax limits
- legal updatesEversheds Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – Quarter 1, 2026
Uusimmat Uutiset
legal updates
02. kesäkuuta 2026
Illinois tax increases part two: Digital asset privilege tax, prediction ma...
legal updates
01. kesäkuuta 2026
Illinois tax increases part one: Digital services taxes
podcasts and webcasts
14. toukokuuta 2026
Federal preemption primer: The Supremacy Clause and state tax limits
legal updates
11. toukokuuta 2026
Eversheds Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – Quarter 1, 2026
media mentions
27. huhtikuuta 2026
Distinguished Leaders: Maria Todorova, Eversheds Sutherland
media mentions
02. huhtikuuta 2026
Big Tech Legal Fight Looming After Utah Enacts Targeted Ad Tax
media mentions
01. huhtikuuta 2026
NY Tax Changes Up In Air As Budget Talks Stretch On
media mentions
16. maaliskuuta 2026
Taxpayers Ramp Up Use of Skip-the-Line Path in State Disputes